The count stands at the moment…
1. On Sunday there was a minor earthquake in SFO – see Chad
2. My friend Dennis had a heart attack on Sunday in Tracy Ca.
3. Carrie’s dad died on Tuesday in London Ont
4. There was a landslide in SFO on Tuesday near Chad’s house
5. I Failed the exam we had 2 weeks ago in Modern Christianity – WTF
6. Tomorrow I have a mass to attend at noon for Charles
7. Friday I have a funeral to Attend for Sister Michelina
Please – no more deaths – tragedies – heart attacks – for the rest of the week
Regular posting will resume shortly, please stay tuned…
God, help us…
I believe the earth has shifted on its axis …
By Neil Smith
Equus deals with controversial themes of sexuality
A star-studded audience saw Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe make his full West End debut in Equus.
Christian Slater, Bob Geldof and Richard E Grant were just a few of the luminaries who braved the paparazzi outside London’s Gielgud Theatre.
Miranda Richardson, Stephen Fry and Helena Bonham Carter – performers with close ties to the Harry Potter phenomenon – were also in attendance.
For all the celebrity talent in the stalls, however, there was only one focus of attention once the lights went down.
The controversial nature of Peter Shaffer’s 1973 play, combined with reports of Radcliffe’s on-stage nudity, has already made this the hottest ticket in town.
To concentrate on the sensational aspects of Thea Sharrock’s production, however, would be a disservice to its star’s accomplished and thoroughly committed performance.
Boasting a well-toned physique and a compelling stage presence, Radcliffe quickly distances himself from his boy wizard alter-ego.
Indeed, the overriding impression is of a gifted young actor casting off the shackles of a restrictive screen persona.
Radcliffe and Joanna Christie leave little to the imagination
True, he is perhaps too composed to be wholly credible as Alan Strang, the disturbed stable boy sectioned for blinding six horses.
Nor do his polished vowels befit a character who, according to Shaffer’s text, is both ill-educated and semi-literate.
With a maturity and intensity that belie his 17 years, though, the teenage heart-throb compellingly conveys the angst and trauma of a youth in crisis.
And as Shaffer pieces together the sorry history that led him to commit such an inexplicable act of violence, Radcliffe ensures he retains both our sympathy and our compassion.
Looking visibly drained and shaken as he took his bows, Tuesday’s opening night clearly took its toll on an actor with minimal theatrical experience.
Then again, he had just been required to strip naked for a sex scene with co-star Joanna Christie that leaves little to the imagination.
With two rows of audience members seated directly behind the actors on stage, there is nowhere to hide.
It would be no slight on their exertions, though, to lavish equal praise on Richard Griffiths for his work as the conflicted therapist who guides Strang through his psychological minefield.
In a role created on stage by Alec McCowen and played on film by Richard Burton, Griffiths is a portrait of avuncular concern tempered by nagging self-doubt.
Richard Griffiths’ performance has also been praised
It is a dichotomy that mirrors the play’s ambivalent attitude towards psychiatry when it comes to explaining the workings of a tortured mind.
Animal lovers will be relieved to know Equus – the Latin word for horse – has actors wearing metal headgear standing in for actual livestock.
In lesser hands such a device might seem incongruous, but Sharrock makes it feel entirely natural.
This is no mean feat in a drama that presents a lurid cocktail of sexual repression, religious obsession and stylised animal cruelty.
But the real triumph is Radcliffe’s for winning his thespian spurs in one of the most demanding roles an actor his age could tackle.
Compared to the emotional exposure the part entails, his well-publicised disrobing seems almost incidental.
Harry Potter fans, though, have one more shock in store should they choose to see their hero in his current guise.
More shocking than wounding horses and having sex? Perhaps. Shortly after the interval, Daniel smokes a cigarette.
Equus continues at the Gielgud Theatre in central London.
And I Am Telling You (I’m Not Going) by WonderRobbie
I am saddened to report to the Concordia Community and to my readers that one of our spiritual directors at the Interfaith Chaplaincy of Concordia University has died. Sister Michelina Bertone, SSA died on Sunday suddenly at the Royal Victoria Hospital.
I knew Sister Michelina very well. Many times throughout my University Career I found myself sitting in her office hysterical about where I was going with my life, and she always had a kind word for me. It has been a sad day today.
The report came from Father LaFontaine…
She died very suddenly on Sunday morning at the Royal Victoria Hospital – when I spoke to the sisters this afternoon, they were still awaiting the autopsy report. She was only 61 years old, and there had not been any signs of illness, except that she was experiencing shortness of breath and a pain in her side on Thursday, so she went in to emergency on FRiday and they decided to keep her over the weekend while tests were done.As you can imagine, her religious community, the youth ministry network, and the students and staff she served at Concordia University for the past 19 years are all in shock. Please keep them all in your prayers.
Fr. Raymond LaFontaine will be presiding at the funeral Mass for Sr. Micki:
FRIDAY, MARCH 2 AT 1:30 pm
Chapel of the Motherhouse of the Sisters of Saint Anne, 745 rue Esther-Blondin, Lachine
(corner of Provost & 18th Ave.): 514-637-3783
There will be a wake service as well:
THURSDAY, 1 MARCH AT 7:30 pm (same place as above, 3rd floor)
Visitation is Thursday from 3-5 and 7-9, and Friday from 12,00 to 1.00 pm.
Please spread the word to those you know who knew Sr. Micki. I imagine there will be an announcement in the Gazette tomorrow (Wednesday).
Tonight the world welcomed Bob Woodruff back to ABC news. How happy are we too see him back where he belongs. I must first tell you that for the whole of my young adult life, and now, as an adult, I have been a supporter of ABC. For many years, ABC news was the outlet that I have been tuned to as an American and as well here in Montreal.
My viewer ship began way back when Peter Jennings first took his seat in the anchor chair, I was just a boy then. So over the years I have maintained a relationship with ABC news. In the years since 9-11 Peter Jennings was always the voice of calm reassurance in times of tragedy and national suffering. And when Peter died, it shook me to my core because for so many years, he was another “father figure” I had in my life. So it goes when Bob Woodruff, Elizabeth Vargas and Charles Gibson took over the evening news, I stayed with ABC because I believed in their work.
It goes without saying that Bob Woodruff, was someone to watch. he had big shoes to fill, and I respected him as a news anchor and a world news reporter. So when he was injured in Iraq, I was moved to pray. Tonight Bob reported on his trip to Iraq and back. I have to say that his recovery was nothing short of a miracle. But as the story was told, there was more than one miracle, the survival of many soldiers are miracles and sadly, the fact that not all soldiers who return from war, come back whole, mentally solid and without injury. Injury is not a simple matter and varies on sometimes specific critical degrees. And many of them are not getting the much needed critical care they need upon returning state side.
I know what it is like to sit in an ICU and hope that the one you love, wakes up from a severe brain injury. I know what it is like to fight back to learn how to sit up and relearn how to talk and to walk as well. I once was in the position as caregiver to a severely injured significant other. So I “Get It!” I understand, I can identify. I also know what it is like for a veteran to go into a V.A. system in rural middle America to get get medical care, because I once lived in rural middle America. So I get that as well.
Bob reported real and raw numbers. The fact that the real hard numbers are not being reported, that many critical care war wounded are not getting the care they need from a nation that sent them to war, when they return from tours of duty in Afghanistan and Iraq. This grateful nation has not done ALL it Can Do, for those who Sacrificed all they had to protect this grateful nation from terrorists. The American Government has failed in providing the 100% care that war torn soldiers deserve after serving tours of duty on the front lines overseas.
The U.S. Government wants their men and women in uniform to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan for years at a time, and they tell the soldiers that they will be taken care of and now we see tonight that some of the most critically wounded soldiers are NOT getting the much deserved and required health care they need upon returning state side. This must stop and it must stop now.
The U.S. Government must be held accountable for every single life they send over seas to fight. Each and every wounded soldier deserves every ounce of special care they need, when their very lives are on the line. This not only means for the soldiers coming home, but for their families as well. There are many projects you can participate in and I encourage you to go to the
and see how you can help those men and women who fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. As reported there are over 200,000 soldiers who need special care. There are over 1.5 million soldiers who have fought over seas in the last two wars. They deserve to be cared for and they must not be allowed to slip through the cracks of The Government Veterans Administration. We must call for government transparency when reporting war wounded and to properly screen those soldiers who need special care. All soldiers who return from war, must be screened for T.B.I. (Traumatic Brain Injuries), seen or unseen.
It just seemed to me that watching this report, I am led to believe that there are soldiers that are not getting the much needed care they deserve. That the U.S. government is under reporting the hard numbers, and that the Veterans Administration is well over burdened by the massive numbers of seriously wounded soldiers coming home. That the many Veterans Hospitals are under prepared to care for those injured soldiers coming home. The government, in this respect, has fallen short of its commitment to care for the returning soldiers. The government has failed in its job to make sure that every soul that goes over seas to fight comes home to the best care possible.
The U.S. President George W. Bush is directly responsible to make sure that his government is clued into these facts. I think he is BLINDED by POWER. There are so many soldiers over seas fighting. My oldest friend is serving in administration capabilities to repatriate soldiers upon their return to the U.S. out on the West coast.
I think this report by Bob Woodruff is going to ignite a firestorm of CONDEMNATION of the U.S. President and his government and I can imagine in the coming days as this report circulates through the halls of justice in Washington D.C. and throughout the country that heads are going to roll.
We should end this war NOW. We should bring back our soldiers NOW! We should stop sending our men and women over seas to fight BECAUSE there are so many coming home with critical injuries and if not every one is getting optimal specific care and reports such as Bob’s are being told, then there are service men and women being let allowed to fall through the cracks, when the U.S. government should provide any care necessary to make sure that soldiers get what they need, and they are not !!!! If there are no soldiers to send over seas, then there would be no more traumatically injured soldiers to add to the already over tasked system. Then we could concentrate on taking care of the MILLIONS of soldiers that need care Right Now!!!
We should end these wars. And the only way to do that is to STOP the government from deploying any more troops. The war has to end. This must stop. Or travesties like these will continue to be perpetrated. And you know, what the government does not tell you won’t kill you!! Because Americans are so bred and groomed to Never Question your leaders and Never, by God, question your government because they take really great care of their own DON’T THEY!!! I will close with the following thoughts for you to ponder…
We are safe!
Your soldiers are being cared for!
We have the best health care in the world!
And your government has all of our best intentions in mind!
That this war is not about OIL, HALLIBURTON Contracts, and MONEY!
That if your son or daughter goes to Iraq or Afghanistan, and they come home injured that they are going to receive the BEST health care available, paid for by Your Tax Dollars and the U.S. Government…
Go to the Wounded Warrior Project and do something to help them
See Bob Woodruff’s Report at: ABC NEWS.COM
There is one woman who changed my life, when I most needed it. After such long suffering it was she who led me to life again. And for years I have talked about her. I have shared with you many many lessons that I learned from her and her inspirations. Now on this night she introduced us, and the world, The Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa.
I wept watching this presentation. It was one of the most beautiful presentations that Oprah has presented, next to her Christmas Kindness project in Africa each Christmas. If you did not get a chance to see it, the special will be rebroadcast over the weekend.
Please, Get involved. Take some time to give back to the children of the generation to come, go to Oprah.Com and navigate your way to the Leadership Academy Page and help Oprah, help the children. There is so much we can do to give back. And if this is one part of our Lenten journey, it will be to understand what we have and how not to take it for granted. I wept for the strength of these wonderful and beautiful girls. My heart breaks for these girls to know the pain they have seen and lived through.
But you wouldn’t know, would you? How many of you know from Aids or HIV? how many of you have been directly affected by the disease? I am one of those people, so this story hit me right where it hurts the most. Children should not have to live through what these children have. It is my goal to give to the school whenever I can.
Join Me on this journey and participate: Oprah’s Leadership Academy!!!
There is an Oprah button on my sidebar. Make one of your own and join us in building the future of the world. Do something today to make you feel proud…
From Dr. Matthew Anderson:
Dear students – here’s something that I wrote today in response to the news release this evening out of New York. I hope that you enjoy it and would welcome your feedback -
Dr. Matthew R. Anderson, Dept of Theological Studies, Dept of Religion
To my students:
Breaking News: The Tomb of Jesus
By the end of this first week back from our winter break, most of you will have heard about the press conference being held tonight (Monday Feb 27) in New York city, at which film-maker James Cameron (The Titanic) and our own Montreal-based documentary maker Simcha Jacobovici will unveil their discovery of the tomb of Jesus.
Wait a minute, you say. The tomb of Jesus? Wouldn’t that mean…? Well, yes. It would. No resurrection, certainly (a proposition of faith hotly debated from the beginning according to the New Testament itself). A deflating of two thousand years of pious belief and saintly prayers, not to mention a lot of fancy and very expensive Gothic architecture.
Like St. Paul said (in 1 Corinthians): “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile.” Christians all over the world would be – if one believes the news – should be, wringing their hands.
But before arguing theology with Cameron and Jacobovici (and the Discovery Channel, which has a potential financial windfall riding on the winding up of this controversy), perhaps the actual facts of the “discovery” need revisiting:
Firstly, this is not the first TV special about this find. Ten years ago the BBC produced a similar but more modest program on the same “discovery”. In fact, the ossuaries in question, containing the names Jesus, Mary, and Judah among ten ossuaries in total, were “discovered” in Talpiot, a suburb south of Jerusalem in 1980, not 2007.
They were dated to the first entry, and likely do come from about the time of Jesus’ crucifixion. However, at the time of their discovery, and despite the names found on them, the burial boxes were considered rather unremarkable by Amos Kloner, the Jerusalem archaeologist and academic who first documented them. As he still maintains (see the Jerusalem Post article referred to below) the idea that the ossuary with the name of Jesus is the “bone-box” of the Christian’s Jesus of Nazareth is “nonsense”.
Among other arguments he raises several points likely to be under-stressed by the Discovery Channel: firstly, the names were extremely common in first century Judea, and secondly, Jesus was, as all the canonical Gospels agree, a Galilean, not a wealthy Jerusalemite, whose family was also Galilean.
But such objections will not likely stop the media frenzy surrounding the launching of the book “The Jesus Family Tomb” and the premiere of the film “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” to be aired March 4th on Discovery and March 6th on Vision TV. And that is likely the most germane point to be made about all this publicity.
It’s almost – one could say – Titanic-sized publicity. And as we all know, the more publicity, the more bums will be in seats to watch the Discovery Channel or Vision TV. What we will see will not likely be revolutionary. According to the Discovery channel’s own “news” release, the evidence is entirely circumstantial. To be fair, it cannot but be: when Discovery says that it is using DNA evidence to validate the find, whose DNA are they
using? There is simply no archaeological evidence of Jesus at all, for the very simple and very good reason that he was not important enough at the time to have left anything physically monumental behind.
Given what we think we know of his preaching, it is unlikely that Jesus would have left the world a monument even if he could have. The “Jesus’ Tomb” media launch, despite seeming very “scientific” and the very opposite of faith, actually shares a lot with the frantic medieval Christian fascination with relics. And as with the medieval peddler of “real” pieces of the cross (enough to build several ships, apparently), there is more than a little of the con-artist and huckster in the present-day circus. Given the huge financial windfall of Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code, it is not surprising that another of the ossuaries discovered is being labeled as Mary Magdalene’s, and another as the child of the happily-wedded couple.
It is all, one could say, rather too neat. Twenty-seven years after these bones were first uncovered, is it new evidence that will bring them out (they are presently on loan from the Israeli Antiquities Authority)? Or is it, rather: a/ the proximity of Easter, always a good time to launch something controversial, such as last year’s Gospel of Judas, also launched in Lent; b/the nice tie-in to The Da Vinci Code and its theories of a Jesus – Magdalene family line, and c/the very credible hope of immense profits made on the backs of the religiously or non-religious gullible?
Frankly, it’s fun to have such media events, because they bring some controversy and excitement to the usually fairly-stuffy issue of the origins of Christianity. But the old adage, “buyer beware” should be our watchword if we take this launch too seriously. If we take Oscar-winners and Hollywood media interests on faith, our faith, like Paul says, may
well be in vain.
Check it out for yourself: the Discovery Channel has a dedicated website/promotional site for its upcoming special on the Talpiot tomb:
Ron Cameron and here are two articles on the issue, the first from the Jerusalem Post, the second a “news” release from Discovery Channel:New film claims Jesus buried in Talpiot
By DAVID HOROVITZ
The Jerusalem Post
The Israeli-born, Canadian-based filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici is reigniting claims, first made over a decade ago, that a burial cave uncovered 27 years ago in Talpiot, Jerusalem, is the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth and his family. At a press conference in New York on Monday, the two-time Emmy winner Jacobovici and his team – including Hollywood director James Cameron – will detail claims that of 10 ossuaries found in the cave when it was discovered in 1980, six bear inscriptions identifying them as those of Jesus, his mother Mary, a second Mary (possibly Mary Magdalene), and relatives Matthew, Josa and Judah (possibly Jesus’s son). Their documentary will be screened this week in the US, UK, on Channel 8 in Israel and around the world. The producers are said to have worked on the project with world-renowned archeologists, statisticians and DNA specialists.
But Bar-Ilan University Prof. Amos Kloner, the Jerusalem District archeologist who officially oversaw the work at the tomb in 1980 and has published detailed findings on its contents, on Saturday night dismissed the claims. “It makes a great story for a TV film,” he told The Jerusalem Post. “But it’s impossible. It’s nonsense.”
Kloner, who said he was interviewed for the new film but has not seen it, said the names found on the ossuaries were common, and the fact that such apparently resonant names had been found together was of no significance. He added that “Jesus son of Joseph” inscriptions had been found on several other ossuaries over the years.
“There is no likelihood that Jesus and his relatives had a family tomb,” Kloner said. “They were a Galilee family with no ties in Jerusalem. The Talpiot tomb belonged to a middle-class family from the 1st century CE.” A spokeswoman for the Israel Antiquities Authority had no comment herself on the documentary and referred inquiries to Kloner, who no longer works for the IAA.
The spokeswoman did say, however, that the IAA has loaned out two of the ossuaries that were found in the Talpiot tomb for display by the filmmakers at Monday’s New York press conference. She said it was a routine procedure to lend out such artifacts provided the borrowers complied with the necessary handling, transport and insurance requirements and that it did not signal any IAA authentication of claims made in the
Kloner said the IAA had been “very foolish” to agree to the loan. “The left hand there doesn’t know what the right hand is doing,” he said. The Daily Telegraph reported this weekend that the 10 ossuaries removed from the tomb when it was first excavated “were taken initially to the Rockefeller Archaeological Museum outside the Old City of Jerusalem. Nine were catalogued and stored but the tenth was left outside in a courtyard.
That ossuary has subsequently gone missing.” But Kloner said the IAA routinely left ossuaries in the courtyard if they were not inscribed and were unremarkable, since it had no room for them all “under our roofs.” He added: “Nothing has disappeared.”
The Jacobovici documentary comes more than 10 years after similar speculation about the so-called Jesus family tomb made world headlines, prompting a London Sunday Times feature entitled “The Tomb that Dare Not Speak Its Name” and a BBC documentary.
The assertion that the ossuaries found in the Talpiot tomb were those of Jesus of Nazareth and family members was branded by The Sunday Times at the time as an archeological discovery “that challenges the very basis of Christianity.”
The makers of the documentary are refusing to discuss its content prior to their New York press conference. Also: the following “news” story, written by Jennifer Viegas, appears in
the Discovery Channel news, dateline February 25, 2007: Jesus Family Tomb Believed Found Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News Feb. 25, 2007 – New scientific evidence, including DNA analysis conducted at one of the world’s foremost molecular genetics laboratories, as well as studies by leading scholars, suggests a 2,000-year-old Jerusalem tomb could have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family.
The findings also suggest that Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have produced a son named Judah. The DNA findings, alongside statistical conclusions made about the artifacts – originally excavated in 1980 – open a potentially significant chapter in Biblical archaeological history.
A documentary presenting the evidence, “The Lost Tomb of Jesus,” will premiere on the Discovery Channel on March 4 at 9 p.m. ET/PT. The documentary comes from executive producer James Cameron and director Simcha Jacobovici.
The Talpiot Tomb
On March 28, 1980, a construction crew developing an apartment complex in Talpiot, Jerusalem, uncovered a tomb, which archaeologists from the Israeli Antiquities Authority excavated shortly thereafter. Archaeologist Shimon Gibson surveyed the site and drew a layout plan. Scholar L.Y.
Rahmani later published “A Catalogue of Jewish Ossuaries” that described 10 ossuaries, or limestone bone boxes, found in the tomb. Scholars know that from 30 B.C. to 70 A.D., many people in Jerusalem would first wrap bodies in shrouds after death. The bodies were then placed in carved rock tombs, where they decomposed for a year before the bones were placed in an ossuary.
Five of the 10 discovered boxes in the Talpiot tomb were inscribed with names believed to be associated with key figures in the New Testament: Jesus, Mary, Matthew, Joseph and Mary Magdalene. A sixth inscription, written in Aramaic, translates to “Judah Son of Jesus.”
“Such tombs are very typical for that region,” Aaron Brody, associate professor of Bible and archaeology at the Pacific School of Religion and director of California’s Bade Museum told Discovery News.
At least four leading epigraphers have corroborated the ossuary inscriptions for the documentary, according to the Discovery Channel.Frank Moore Cross, a professor emeritus in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Harvard University, told Discovery News,”The inscriptions are from the Herodian Period (which occurred from around1 B.C. to 1 A.D.). The use of limestone ossuaries and the varied scriptstyles are characteristic of that time.”
Jodi Magness, associate department chair of religious studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told Discovery News that, based on the New Testament writings, “Jesus likely lived during the firstcentury A.D.”
In addition to the “Judah son of Jesus” inscription, which is written in Aramaic on one of the ossuaries, another limestone burial box is labeled in Aramaic with “Jesus Son of Joseph.” Another bears the Hebrew inscription “Maria,” a Latin version of “Miriam,” or, in English, “Mary.” Yet another ossuary inscription, written in Hebrew, reads “Matia,” the
original Hebrew word for “Matthew.” Only one of the inscriptions is written in Greek. It reads, “Mariamene e Mara,” which can be translated as, “Mary known as the master.”
Francois Bovon, professor of the history of religion at Harvard University, told Discovery News, “Mariamene, or Mariamne, probably was the actual name given to Mary Magdalene.”
Bovon explained that he and a colleague discovered a fourteenth century copy in Greek of a fourth century text that contains the most complete version of the “Acts of Philip” ever found. Although not included in the Bible, the “Acts of Philip” mentions the apostles and Mariamne, sister of the apostle Philip.
“When Philip is weak, she is strong,” Bovon said. “She likely was a great teacher who even inspired her own sect of followers, called Mariamnists, who existed from around the 2nd to the 3rd century.” DNA Analysis Jacobovici, director, producer and writer of “The Lost Tomb of Jesus,” and his team obtained two sets of samples from the ossuaries for DNA and chemical analysis. The first set consisted of bits of matter taken from the “Jesus Son of Joseph” and “Mariamene e Mara” ossuaries. The second set consisted of patina – a chemical film encrustation on one of the limestone boxes.
The human remains were analyzed by Carney Matheson, a scientist at the Paleo-DNA Laboratory at Lakehead University in Ontario, Canada. Mitochondrial DNA examination determined the individual in the Jesus ossuary and the person in the ossuary linked to Mary Magdalene were not related.
Since tombs normally contain either blood relations or spouses, Jacobovici and his team suggest it is possible Jesus and Mary Magdalene were a couple. “Judah,” whom they indicate may have been their son, could have been the “lad” described in the Gospel of John as sleeping in Jesus’ lap at the Last Supper.
Robert Genna, director of the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory in New York, analyzed both the patina taken from the Talpiot Tomb and chemical residue obtained from the “James” ossuary, which was also found around 1980, but subsequently disappeared and resurfaced in the antiquities market. Although controversy surrounds this burial box, Genna found that the two patinas matched.
“The samples were consistent with each other,” Genna told Discovery News. Upon examining the tomb, the filmmakers determined a space exists that would have fit the “James” ossuary. Given the patina match and this observation, Jacobovici theorizes the lost burial box could, in fact, be the “James” ossuary.
A possible argument against the Talpiot Tomb being the Jesus Family Tomb is that the collection of names on the ossuary inscriptions could be coincidental.
But Andrey Feuerverger, professor of statistics and mathematics at the University of Toronto, recently conducted a study addressing the probabilities that will soon be published in a leading statistical journal.
Feuerverger multiplied the instances that each name appeared during the tomb’s time period with the instances of every other name. He initially found “Jesus Son of Joseph” appeared once out of 190 times, Mariamne appeared once out of 160 times and so on.
To be conservative, he next divided the resulting numbers by 25 percent, a statistical standard, and further divided the results by 1,000 to attempt to account for all tombs – even those that have not been uncovered – that could have existed in first century Jerusalem.
The study concludes that the odds are at least 600 to 1 in favor of the Talpiot Tomb being the Jesus Family Tomb. In other words, the conclusion works 599 times out of 600.
The researchers discovered a second, as-yet unexplored tomb about 65 1/2 feet from the Talpiot Tomb. During the documentary, they introduced a robotic camera into this second tomb, which captured the first-ever recorded footage of an undisturbed burial cave from Jesus’ time. The team speculates that this other tomb could contain the remains of additional family members, or even disciples, though further examination and analysis
As Academy Award-winner Cameron said in a press release, “It doesn’t get bigger than this. We’ve done our homework; we’ve made the case; and now it’s time for the debate to begin.”
With 39 years of life as a Christian and 4 years of a Religious education in University taught by very reputable professors and teaching assistants, I will give you my take on this very tantalizing news. I also spent a year in a Catholic Seminary…
We must take this news with the same skepticism as researchers and scholars of the Christian and Judean faiths. If this is true then so be it. Many have spoken out against the find and give it no real credence. If your faith is grounded in reality and found in a solid foundation, news like this should not shake ones faith. We must wait for real “proof” of the reality and validity of these claims, which have begun some decades ago.
As Christians, we believe that Jesus was crucified on Good Friday, died on the cross and was buried in a tomb, and on the third day he was resurrected from the dead AND that he ascended into heaven, where he sits at God’s right hand.
We should NOT question our faith, just because someone makes a BOLD claim such as this. We must look at every piece of evidence in light of location, time dating, academic and religious proof and finally scientific scrutiny. Religions are changing but the core beliefs we share should NOT! Jesus is Jesus and God is God, that will never change.
The academic and religious community will weigh in – and then the world will wait for a definitive answer. This should be no surprise, because when the DaVinci Code was released we talked about the possibility of Jesus, being married to Mary Magdalene and producing the child Sarah.
With the new Gnostic gospels coming forth into the discussion of religion and the further excavation of Holy cities, we may find new truths to add to the major monotheistic religions of the world. We cannot and should not discount any theory until we can either prove the theory or debunk it.
Your faith should be solid and not stirred by any archaeological find. Our faith is based on the teachings of the Church, what ever church you identify with. What ever faith you belong to, be that Muslim, Jewish or Christian.
Titanic director James Cameron and Canadian filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici say they aren’t trying to undermine Christianity in their new documentary that claims the remains of Jesus, his wife, Mary Magdalene, and their child have been found.
Oscar-winner Cameron and Gemini-winner Jacobovici unveiled two limestone boxes they believe once contained the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdalene during a news conference Monday at the New York Public Library.
Cameron, best-known for producing the blockbuster movie Titanic, said the $4-million US documentary doesn’t set out to undermine Christianity.
“It’s very far from the case,” said Cameron. “What this does is celebrate the real-life existence of … this man, who, 2,000 years ago, had a vision and communicated it to people.”
The claim that the bones of Jesus have been found could challenge the Christian belief that Jesus died and was resurrected three days later.
Many Christians believe Jesus’ body was kept at the site of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem’s Old City. The burial site identified in the documentary is in a southern Jerusalem neighbourhood nowhere near the church.
Claims Nonsense, says experts
Rev. Canon William Cliff, rector and chaplain at Huron University College at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ont., said he’s “doubtful” about the claims in the documentary.
“The Christian faith has always believed that Jesus was resurrected, so there would be no bones,” said Cliff, who also teaches theology at the Anglican Church of Canada-affiliated college.
The Israeli-born, Canadian-raised Jacobovici said the documentary is not trying to answer any questions, but is intended to “bring the story to the world and let the experts weigh in.”
Jerusalem-based biblical expert Joe Zias called the documentary nonsense, saying those involved in the project have “no credibility whatsoever.”
“It’s an old story that’s been recycled. The story first broke in 1996 by the BBC. It burst in a couple of days,” Zias said.
A tomb such as the one discovered in 1980 would have held more than 200 ossuaries and there is no way to determine whether six of those boxes contained the remains of members of a single nuclear family, Zias said.
Ossuaries found in 1980
The documentary examines 10 ancient ossuaries, first found in a tomb by a construction crew working in the Jerusalem suburb of Talpiyot in 1980. Experts from the Israeli Antiquities Authority excavated the site shortly after, finding the 10 limestone boxes inside.
Six of the ten limestone boxes were inscribed with names that could be translated as Jesus, Mary, Matthew, Joseph, Mary Magdalene and Judah, son of Jesus, said Jacobovici.
Some experts have countered these were common Jewish names at the time and that Jesus’ carpenter father couldn’t have afforded a crypt for his family.
While the bones found in the boxes were buried in a consecrated area in Jerusalem, Jacobovici said forensic experts can examine DNA material from human residue.
Jacobovici sent samples from the Jesus and Mary Magdalene ossuaries to the paleo-DNA lab at Ontario’s Lakehead University, one of five labs in the world that can extract DNA from ancient material.
The tests showed the remains in the Jesus ossuary were not linked to the remains in the Mary Magdalene ossuary through their maternal sides, he said.
Tombs from that time usually contained blood relatives and spouses, leading the filmmakers to believe Jesus and Mary Magdalene were a couple. The filmmakers said testing is continuing to determine whether the two were related through their paternal side.
Patinas match ‘James’ ossuary
The filmmakers also tested the patinas — the chemical film encrusting the limestone boxes — at the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory in New York.
They say the samples from the Talpiyot ossuaries matched the patina of the controversial James ossuary, first found around 1980.
The Israeli owner of the James ossuary made the limestone box public in 2002, saying its inscription — “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus” — proved its authenticity.
Israel’s Antiquities Authority has declared the inscription fake and Israeli police have charged the ossuary’s owner, Oded Golan, with forgery.
The Lost Tomb of Christ airs on Discovery on Friday and on Canada’s Vision TV on Sunday.
With files from the Canadian Press
Genesis 15-18 The covenant of God with Abraham ; A son is promised _ Genèse 15-18 L’alliance de Dieu avec Abraham . Un fils est promis.
19 Zwirner Synagogue De Cologne.jpg
9_Zwirner_Synagogue de Cologne…Comme les etoiles Synagogue de Cologne GlockengasseVue interieure 1861 Chrompolithographie Cologne Kollnishes Stadtmuseum Gabrielle Sed Rajna L’Art Juif
We, too, have been summoned to [like Abraham by God] and are sustained along the journey of faith by that same faithful Lord. There remain many things we do not understand and other we long to know more about. Yet, in the end, the total trustworthyness of God sustains us along that long and difficult journey.
Perhaps we need to remind ourselves of the trustworthiness of that God and His immense and overflowing love for us. So we turn to consider another landmark that guides us as we travel.
Many Christians understand that they have been redeemed by Christ but have failed to appreciate the enormous implications of this fundamental gospel theme. We must not treat our redemption in Christ simply as an idea we understand. We need to go deeper – much deeper.
To being with, we need to STOP treating the cross of Christ as just a slogan or a theological formula and grasp it as a life-changing event. Clear your mind of every irrelevant thought and begin to focus on Christ dying on the cross, gradually filling in the fine detail around it. Allow the cross to impact on your emotions, not just on your intellect.
In closing we return to the words of Martin Luther who said “Whatever your heart clings to and confides in, that is really your God.” Have we allowed our career, our finances, or our status to become our God by making these things into the things in which we trust and which we constantly think about?
Lex Orandi – Lex Cred Endi … What we pray is what we believe…
Issac Watts ( 1674-1748 ) writes:
Have we allowed our career, our finances, or our status to become our God by making these into the things in which we trust and which we constantly think about? Watts words challenge us:
“Where the whole realm of nature mine,
That were an offering far too small;
Love so amazing, so divine,
Demands my soul, my life, my all
Goodnight from Montreal …
We are a teaching ahead now, more tomorrow…
Ta Ta For Now…
It is important as we journey along the road of faith to remember that we need to stop to rest, to pray, to devote time to God, to pray and more importantly, to Meditate. Because when we pray, we do all the talking, when we meditate, we allow the Lord [God] to speak to us. And how many of us make time to just sit and listen for His voice, amid the business of the day?
We find these themes of human tiredness and divine renewal in one of the great prophetic visions of the Old Testament (Isaiah 40:39-41)
[The Lord] gives strength to the weary
and increases the power of thr weak.
Even youths grow tired and weary,
And young men stumble and fall;
But those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength,
They will soar on wings like eagles;
They will run and not grow weary,
They will walk, and not be faint.
This great vision of the divine renewal of those who wait on the Lord is enormously comforting and reassuring. “Many of those who begin the Christian journey with great enthusiasm and excitement find that they run out of energy and can no longer cope with its demands.”
“My soul finds rest in God alone” (Psalm 62:1)
We need to make space for God in our lives. If we don’t, we will simply become so busy that we exclude God. If we are so busy that we don’t have time to enjoy the radiance of God’s presence, we are dishonoring God.
The Command to observe a day of rest (Exodus 20:8-11) is not some optional extra that can be discounted by those with busy lives. It is just as important as other commandments.
Significant snow is on the schedule for Thursday and Friday… SIGNIFICANT!!!
God has a long history of taking self-confessed failures and doing great things through them. Perhaps when we fail, we are most receptive to the grace of God.
Paul had to learn that lesson the hard way. He tells us that God chose humble him through a “thorn in the flesh” (2Cor 12:1-10) – perhaps an illness that prevented him from carrying out some of the missionary undertakings he had planned. He needed to be taught not to trust in his won strength but to rely on God. In his weakness, he heard God speak these words “My grace is sufficient for you, my power is made perfect in weakness.” Failure discloses our weakness and helps us discover God’s power.
Hitchhiking a ride: Alexander MacLaren
Alexander MacLaren (1826-1910) was one of the greatest Scottish preachers of the nineteenth century, even if his ministry took place virtually in England. He writes for us:
The classic example of [failure] this is the cross of Christ. The world regarded Christ’s death on the cross as a failure; in reality, it was a victory over the world. MacLaren insists that we learn from this seminal insight and take courage. “The way to overcome our troubles is to bear them; the way to conquer our crosses is willingly to lay them on our shoulders.” Christ has overcome the world; we share in that victory.
Those who experience the pain and grief of failure are encouraged to look to the cross and find comfort and consolation in Christ:
Put your trust in Him as the sacrifice for your sins, and as the spirit of your lives you look to Him not only as example, not only as pattern, but as power; you think of Him, not only as dying on the cross for you, but as living in you, and then you will find, as sure as He lives, you will find that He has conquered, and that His conquest is for you …
So be of good cheer; you will have to fight, thank God for it; you will have to fight; you will be beaten as sure as you live if you try to master the world without Jesus; but if you will lay your hands by faith on the Lamb of God, and if you will open your hearts and lives to the influence of His triumphant Spirit, then He will give you a share in His conflict, His conquest, and His royal repose.
Failure is so easily seen in worldly terms, as something purely negative. For MacLaren, it is the key to spiritual growth. Yesterday’s failure is today’s ooportunity for growth, which leads to tomorrow’s success. It reminds us of our need to recognize our weakness and to realize our need to trust in God – not ourselves!
As we struggle along the road of faith, we will encounter failure – sometimes our own failures, sometimes the failure of others. We need to confront them; yet we need also to learn from them. We must keep learning as we travel – ;earning more about the God who so loves us and also about ourselves.
John Calvin reminds us that true wisdom consists of knowing God and knowing ourselves.
As we travel, we come to learn more about ourselves. We discover strengths and weaknesses we had not known before. MacLaren asks us to identify these weaknesses and ensure that they become points of growth and grounds for hope.
MacLaren thus encourages us to trust in the promise of Christ and to realize that by faith we share in a victory the world regarded as a defeat. His sermon ended with the following stirring words – they may encourage us as we struggle through the wilderness.
“To him the overcomes will I grant to sit with Me on My throne, even as I overcame, and am sat down with My Father on His throne.”
And encouraged by this reminder of our final goal, we prepare to press onward…
3 hours – 48 minutes on Canadian Feed Television. What a mess of a broadcast. We lost the feed internationally at 48 minutes into the broadcast for 5 minutes. Ellen was a good host, but I have to say this telecast was a bit disjointed. It was, for me, all over the place, it was messy and sloppy. Those up the aisle “try to be funny” moment with Scorcese and Eastwood were unnecessary.
Not to mention all those God Damned “montages” and “preformance art!” Waste of time… Ben Mulroney said on CTV news that she was a great host, that she brought her tv show persona to the telecast, which I can agree with, but some of the humor was stupid. The whole pijama, that’s our show, and the vacuum bit before Resse Witherspoon took the stage was insulting and not funny. I found that to be unnecessary – yes, the show was running LOOONG, but the vacuum was unnecessary!
There were many upsets tonight and my ballot had more X’s than Checks! Eddie Murphy did not win, Alan Arkin snuk in there, what an upset after that entire Barbara Walter’s build up to the show!! What an upset. He should have won.
Kiss my Ass Simon Cowell, Look Jennifer won the OSCAR, HAHAHAHAH Who’s yer daddy!!! Fantabulous. And the performance of the Dream Girls was incredible. And wouldn’t you know it, Forest Whitaker really had words to share, his speech was amazing. Mrs. Mirren, what a joy, as the Queen.
Three incredible movies. Three incredible winners.
I really did not get into Little Miss Sunshine, yet she won a few awards. Los Tres Amigos won a slew of awards across the board for Pan’s Labrynth, The Lives of Others, and The Blood of Yingzhou District.
And finally Melissa Etheridge won for “I need to wake up” and Mr. Vice President Al Gore for An Inconvenient Truth. It was great to see her perform. I love Melissa, and her music so much, she is a true survivor. I think Leonardo was hoping that Mr. Vice President would have announced his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States, alas, he did not. But Will he later, is the question???
I enjoyed seeing the stars and watching the Oscars, but I think that maybe they need to resurrect Billy Crystal to host from now on. Virgins in the driver seat seem to have a handicap, and the fact that here they only gave a 3 hour block for the telecast and it ran 3 hours 48 minutes. Ellen did ok, but I was expecting a more polished presentation. It was a disappointment.
But we must mention that a GAY WOMAN hosted the Oscars and the Lesbians were well represented tonight !!!! A proud moment for the LGBT Community at large. We have arrived and we hosted the 79th Annual Academy Awards.
Now for the Results … The Bold winners were my choices on my ballot, the regular print winners – were “winners.”
Best motion picture of the year
Performance by an actor in a leading role
Forest Whitaker – THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND
Performance by an actor in a supporting role
Alan Arkin – LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE
Performance by an actress in a leading role
Helen Mirren – THE QUEEN
Performance by an actress in a supporting role –
Isn’t it Ironic that Jennifer Hudson was awarded the Oscar on the same stage where the American Idol is crowned each season!!!
Jennifer Hudson – DREAMGIRLS
Achievement in art direction
Achievement in cinematography
Achievement in costume design
Achievement in directing –
Fantastic, Martin Scorsese, the drought is over….
Best Documentary Feature
AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH
Best documentary short subject
THE BLOOD OF YINGZHOU DISTRICT
Achievement in film editing
Best Animated Short
The Danish Poet – A Montrealer won this Oscar
Best foreign language film of the year
THE LIVES OF OTHERS
Achievement in makeup
Achievement in music written for a motion picture (Original Score)
Best Documentary Feature
An Inconvenient Truth
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)
“I Need to Wake Up” – AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH
LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE
I got out of bed this afternoon, singing Billy Crystal…
“Oh, it’s a Wonderful night for the Oscars, Oscar Oscar… Who will win?”
I’m so silly. I have the next portion of the journey ready to post, from last night’s reading. And I had a serious prayer jam session around 5 a.m. this morning, just me and the Almighty, it was divine.
See you after the Oscars…
Gotta get my tux out of the closet for the festivities…
(St. Francis of Assisi)
Psalm 63 Brings out the yearning for spiritual refreshment after an exhausting struggle along the road of faith:
O God, you are my God
Earnestly I seek you
My soul thirsts for you
My body longs for you
In a dry and weary land
Where there is no water
This Psalm makes the point that it is God alone who can refresh and renew us along the journey of faith. Just as the exertions of physical travel cause us to hunger and thirst for food and drink, the journey of faith must be sustained by the living God.
We can develop this idea of being nourished on the road of faith by meditating on the two New Testament themes that emphasize the need to be sustained by Christ throughout that journey. Both these themes are found in John’s gospel; taken together, they provide a rich and reassuring insight into our journey.
First, Jesus speaks of giving us water, which becomes “a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” (John 4:14) Second, Jesus speaks of being the “bread of life” (John 6:51). Unlike the manna given to Israel in the wilderness, anyone who eats this bread will be satisfied fully and will live forever. Ordinary bread leads to death; this bread leads to eternal life.
Worship refreshes us precisely because it forces us to raise our eyes upwards and appreciate the immensity and grandeur of our maker and redeemer. And excited and invigorated by this vision, we return to the Christian life with a new sense of commitment and renewed energy.
Hitching a Ride: J.I. Packer…
J.I. Packer would find his calling not so much as an academic theologian but as one with a rare and important gift for making theology and spirituality more accessible to a wide readership.
“It is a wonderful thing that we have the privilege of knowing God. yet there is something even more astonishing that we must grasp and treasure – That God knows us. Even before we were born, God knew us.
God Knows us (Psalm 139:1) Imagine being known, warts and all (to use Oliver Cromwell’s famous phrase). For some, this is a deeply threatening idea. Yet, to others, including myself, this is a deeply reassuring thought.
“When we pray, we don’t need to pretend about anything. We don’t need to live in some make believe world in which we constantly struggle to live up to the image we have created for ourselves. In prayer, we enter into the caring presence of one who created us and knows us through and through. We come as we are, asking God to make us what he would have us be, entrusting ourselves to the one who can heal and renew us.”
I life my eyes to the hills -
Where does my help come from?
My help comes from the Lord,
The maker of heaven and earth.
He will not let your foot slip -
He who watches over you will not slumber.
Indeed, he who watches over Israel
Will neither slumber nor sleep.
The Lord watches over you -
The Lord is your shade at your right hand.
The sun will not harm you by day
Nor the moon by night.
The Lord will keep you from all harm -
He will watch over your life;
The Lord will watch over your coming and going
Both now and forevermore.
**For Beverly and Sam and Whitney and Scotty B-goodie!!!**
Recognition of complete despair is invoked in the figure of the Wandering Jew, in whom lurks the profounder despair which results in complete absence of hope. In Sickness unto Death Kierkegaard analyzes the dialectic of despair with brilliant psychological insight. He agrees with Hegel that despair is something a person must taste before he or she comes to true consciousness of life. Thus despair is dialectical and not wholly negative, for it opens us divergent possibilities of response.
Despair can lead to a spiritual hardening and death; it can also serve to awaken a person to his or her eternal validity. But there is no salvation except in passing through despair.
“[A]ny human being who has not tasted the bitterness of despair has fallen short of the meaning of life.”
To despair absolutely is to break one’s bondage to the finite perspective, for “in despairing a person chooses again, and what then does he choose? He chooses himself, not in his immediacy, not in this accidental individual, but he chooses himself in his eternal validity.”
Kierkegaard’s argument for the irreducible singularity of the individual’s status before God is portrayed most effectively in Fear and Trembling. There Kierkegaard offers a sustained analysis of the story of Abraham’s sacrifice of his son Isaac. For Kierkegaard Abraham is the prototype of the exception, the person called by God to perform a task which is a scandal to ethical rationalism.
By means of this story, Kierkegaard asks whether there can be a “teleological suspension of the ethical.” Can there be situations in which one’s absolute obedience to God contravenes the categorical imperative? The answer is yes because, as Kierkegaard remarks, one who knows the living God “determines his relation to the universal by his relation to the absolute, not his relations to the absolute by his relation to the universal.”
According to Kierkegaard, Abraham is even defensible in keeping his purpose a secret before Sarah and Isaac, for the “Knight of Faith” obeys God without seeking to be justified before others.
There is something unique and ineffable about one’s relation to God. Both Kant and Hegel conceived of morality as the subordination of the self to the universal – at the expense, as Kierkegaard saw it, of elements indispensable to the life of the individual.
For all the reasons we have enumerated, all “first ethics” or idealistic ethics fail and require and existential leap of faith to the religious stage of existence. Fear and Trembling reveals the third sphere of existence, the religious.
Text taken from” Modern Christian Thought” From the Enlightenment through the 19th Century, ppgs. 385-397
“The disciple knows that he would have nothing without God’s grace, for without grace he is blinded by error and cannot possibly piece the Absolute Paradox, God incognito. In that case Faith is as paradoxical as the Paradox, for “Faith” is itself a wonder, and everything that holds true of the paradox is also true of faith.”
In Kierkegaard’s opinion passion – or inwardness – is the very criterion of religious faith, for faith is by definition the appropriation of the Absolute Paradox, that which for discursive reason is absurd and historically only probable. Only a faith which exhibits a Passionate appropriation of its object is a true faith. Hence, for Kierkegaard, as for all twentieth century Existentialists, the How or mode of decision, takes precedence over the What, or object of ones devotion.
Nietzsche on the other hand offers the God is dead posit… The entire evolution of humanity’s spiritual life is a question of the body, but “it is the history of the development of a higher body that emerges into our sensibility. The organic is rising to yet higher levels.
We have discussed in earlier 19th century thinkers that If we are to follow Jesus, and internalize his teachings, and we begin (to BEGIN) to (BECOME) like Him then at some point if we evolve into that which we deify, then the Deity disappears into the incarnation of ourselves. That is a really way off discussion, but it begs the question in our conversation that, You and I are in the process of “Becoming.” Religion teaches us about the destination, the eternal inheritance of the kingdom of God. The Kingdom of God is immanent, (when) then or now? Dogma and tradition keeps us in a space that we are always striving for something that we shall never attain in our human existence. Therefore, Love falls on deaf ears. People will not rise to the challenge to Love as God loves, to Do as God does, to Be as Jesus was and (is).
“Out of Love, therefore, the God must be eternally resolved in this way, but just as His love is the basis, so also must LOVE be the GOAL, for it would indeed be a contradiction for the god to have a basis of movement and a goal that do not correspond to this. The love, then, must be for the learner, and the goal must be to win him, for only in love is the different made equal and only in equality or in unity is there understanding… Yet this love is basically unhappy, for they are very unequal, and what seems so easy – namely, that the god must be able to make himself understood – is not so easy if he is not to destroy that which is different.
To accomplish the divine aim, God can neither draw the person up nor appear before that person in awesome glory and majesty. The union can only be accomplished by God’s descent and appearance, not in glory, but in the form of a servant. But, Kierkegaard reminds the reader “the form of the servant was not something put on. Therefore God must suffer all things, endure all things. Thirst all things, be forsaken in death, absolutely the equal of the lowliest of human beings – look, behold the man!” The truth of Christianity comes then at a particular moment in history in which the eternal God appears in the form of a humble human servant.
We can be cookie cutter Christians or we can be bread of life Christians. We can feed those we can or we can sit in the field and expect a Jesus miracle. I kind of like sitting in the field expecting a miracle myself. But we must gather the sheep in our flock and teach them, you know the parable of the seed, right? Where are you casting your seeds? Fertile ground, a Lava field or on the pavement? Can we feed everyone or teach everyone and save everyone? No… Only God can do that.
We are in a period of teaching, study, rebirth and transformation. We are evolving as men, women and Christians. If we remain static the miracles and wisdom of God and of Christ will fail to move us to transform our lives. Christians are far too complacent in their churches, built on shaky foundations to begin with. The real teachings of Christ have gone away, because the world is in such disarray. We must follow Jesus, and we must Be Jesus, and for that to happen we must become “Being” transformed and transfigured. We must strive to make good on the teachings of Christ – we must imbibe the Love of God to be able to Love as God. And the mere mortal Christians does not have the capability to do this just yet, for they do not have ears to hear nor eyes to see the Christ among them. If they did, we would be in a better state of Christian affairs. Alas, we are not…
Pray to God and meditate for the answer. Seek the God of your own understanding where you will find him. Do the work set before you and remain steadfast in his love and share that love with those you can. Those who can “see” shall see, those who can “hear” shall hear, and those who have walked the walk will be rewarded for God’s love in unending and eternal.
Become the man and woman you are meant to be in the guidance and Love of the God who created you and breathed life into your soul.
Martin Luther is one of the most important Christian writers of the sixteenth century. He was at the forefront of the movement to reform and renew that Roman Catholic church, which he regarded as having lost its way.
For Luther, salvation was the gracious gift of a gracious God, something that had to be accepted in trust and faith. Luther placed considerable emphasis upon the total trustworthiness of God. The gospel could be trusted and believed because it rested on the promise of a God who could be relied upon.
Reflecting on the pain and suffering of Christ as he died for us allows us to appreciate the incalculable wonders of God’s graciousness and love in redeeming us. Luther takes this further and applies the image of the dying Christ to the issue of doubt.
“Doubt is our traveling companion in the wilderness, dogging our steps as we journey. It may withdraw from us for a season; its absence, however, proves temporary. Doubt is a lingering presence on the journey. We have to cope with it. Doubt is not simply an academic matter.”
Taking the gospel account of the crucifixion to heart and we have visualized it and placed ourselves within the narrative, ask why this is taking place. He is doing this for us. He didn’t have to; he chose to. We matter so much to him. Anyone who suffers from low self-esteem needs to take this insight to heart. You matter to the greatest one of all.
For Luther, meditating on the wounds of Christ was a superb antidote for any doubt we might have concerning the love of God for us. Each of those wounds is a token of the loving care of a compassionate God.
Form a mental picture of those wounds. Cherish them. It is by them that we are healed. Luther also develops another approach to doubt, which focuses on the cross. They to imagine that you are there on that first Good Friday.
Can you see why the disciples were so distraught? We shall never fully understand the joy of Easter unless we experience the despair of the first Good Friday. Now we can understand Luther’s point. Life on the road of faith bears an uncomfortable likeness to that first Good Friday. We experience our hopes being dashed, our firm beliefs being questioned, and our experiential world thrown into turmoil by what we meet and see. Like those first disciples after the death of Christ, there are times when we find ourselves bewildered and don’t know where to turn.
Luther challenges and encourages us to take this framework and apply it to our experience as we journey though the wilderness.
So how does Luther challenge and encourage us? What can we take away from the time we have spent with him, listening to his insights? There can be no doubt that Luther’s main aim is to reassure us. We must trust in God’s promises and not in our perceptions. Luther challenges us to take courage and keep walking in faith. We may not have answers to all the questions, but we trust in a loving, caring, and totally trustworthy God, the “God of all comfort, who comforts us all in troubles” (2 Cor 1:4).
Alister McGrath, The Journey…pp: 51, 53-58
This is the interior of Christ Church Anglican Cathedral here in Montreal. It is the image that will be the focal point of our Lenten rituals, observances and teachings. Last night I continued in my reading of Alister McGrath’s (The Journey).
We shall divide the journey into stages:
1. A Landmark – giving us structure
2. A Wilderness – times to get through to move forward
3. An Oasis – Parts of the journey to breathe new life into the journey
We shall talk about Hitchhiking on the Road of Faith.
Once we get on the road and we realize that there is much to see, so much to learn and people to learn from, we stop on the side of the road and we contemplate what is to come. And we realize that there are others on this road, who have been where we are, who have seen their journey and are here again, to help those of us who have taken on this journey of faith ourselves this time. Wouldn’t it be great if I hitchhiked along with someone who has walked on this road before?
What would it have been like for the Israelites – during the Exodus, if they had met up with certain hitchhikers in the middle of the Desert, and they did, in fact… The Old Testament speaks of the Desert Folk, who helped them along the way.
That is why, at the outset of this journey I told you to make sure you had what you needed and that you took only that which was necessary, AND I told you to pay attention to others on the path with you. Unless you stop and share with someone you may not know if that person is new to the journey or an old soul here to guide you further.
Which is why, during the Lenten Journey it is important to include those rituals that you believe are necessary to bring you to the fullness of religious faith. The Stations of the Cross, The Hours, Vespers, Matins, meditation, and of course, Spiritual Direction.
There are others on this journey with you.
There are opportunities for us all to experience during this Lenten Season. May God be your guide and show you where you might be useful. I will be speaking to the Reverend Canon tomorrow at mass – I see there is a need for someone to lead prayers on Friday’s and hmm, they are praying for a volunteer! I shall inquire tomorrow.
There are works to be read, scripture to be parsed, songs to be sung, masses to be attended and I am sure there is at least one spiritual person in your community that you would truly benefit from, by spending time with.
Hitch a ride with the author of your choosing, or find that spiritual book or text that makes your heart beat faster and harder. Find that prayer that moved you, that scripture that lifts your soul, the ritual that removes you from the hurries of the day and allows you to STOP and spend time with God. I think THAT is the one most important aspect of my spiritual existence, is to find the time to get out of my day to go spend with God in a quiet and sacred space. We should do that every day. Even if we don’t want to we should.
This is another Mandate of our Spiritual journey. To find time to spend with God.
This is the Cross that stands Atop Mount Royal. It is Purple from the Interregnum, after the death of John Paul II, now it is white. I’ve never been up there during the winter because it is so freaking cold to climb all the way to the top. It’s not as easy as you might think, one can take the bus up the mountain, but that would be cheating…
It’s the CLIMB that matters for those I take up the mountain during season…
I haven’t escorted anyone up the mountain in a long time. Not during the Winter months.
I may attempt it if the weather warms up a bit in the next few weeks. Living in such a scared city affords one many opportunities to get in tough with the Montreal of the past, in its churches and old city centres. One day you might come visit and I will take you on a journey of faith in my home city. The mountain is beautiful in the summer / fall sun with the tams tams being played on a Sunday afternoon as you climb the mountain on a path you choose yourself to explore. Each climb up the mountain is different because of the weathering done on the mountain by the last winter.
So come and climb with us sometime.
After all is said and done and the day is at its end…
- That the god damned fire alarm inspection in the building is completed
- Tomorrow is Friday and I am attending services at Christ Church
- We had a great dinner with some good fun and laughter
- That I can appreciate the scholars in my life
- I am still teachable
- I have a roof over my head, food in the fridge and a warm bed to sleep in
- I know the gift of the Sacred and the Profane
- I am right where I should be at any given moment on any given day
- I have a plan – it is coming to be
- The journey has just begun
- I don’t have to see the doctor until April !!!
- I am not as crazy or insane as some
- I am sober another 24 hours
Justin Trudeau has confirmed he will seek the federal Liberal party nomination in Montreal’s Papineau riding.
The eldest son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau will attempt to jump into politics in a riding currently held by Bloc Québécois MP Vivian Barbot.
Justin Trudeau is following in his father’s footstep, running for the federal Liberals in Quebec.
(Dave Chidley/Canadian Press)
“We’ll see whether I’m crazy or not,” Trudeau said Thursday afternoon.
When asked what his father would have thought about his decision, Trudeau said the former statesman always told his children to “‘make sure you’re doing everything you can do to make the world a better place.’ Today I start a new chapter.”
Trudeau said he’s had “on and off” talks with Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion about his interest in running for office.
Dion welcomed Trudeau’s decision to run for the nomination.
“I’m very impressed by the courage of this young man, to go [into] a tough fight. I’m sure he’ll do it with a lot of dignity.”
The Papineau riding was once a Liberal stronghold, where former foreign affairs minister Pierre Pettigrew was elected three times.
Speculation has swirled around Trudeau’s political intentions in recent months, when he spoke out on several issues, including the environment and national unity.
In the federal Liberal leadership race in November, Trudeau backed candidate Gerard Kennedy, who threw his support behind Dion in a surprise deal that clinched the race.
Did you happen to catch the conversation between McSteamy and Montgomery at the end of the episode tonight, where Addison told McSteamy that he had to go without sex for 60 days and she would consider dating him? 60 days from now will be close to the supposed start of the “Spin Off” pilot to come online… Does that speak of his move as well from Seattle to follow Addison whereever she is going???
hmmm… questions, questions…
LOS ANGELES (February 20, 2007) — It looks like “Grey’s Anatomy” is about to go under the knife to cut out one of its stars… and breathe easy Ellen Pompeo fans, it’s got nothing to do with the recent fiery ferry crash.
ABC has decided to pursue a “Grey’s” spin-off with sexy neonatal surgeon Dr. Addison Montgomery-Shepherd (played by the lovely Kate Walsh) as the lead character, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal.
The pilot has yet to be finalized and “Grey’s” creator Shonda Rhimes has yet to decide on a title. However, Rhimes recently filled the cast in on the idea and revealed she will write a special two-hour episode to serve as the pilot, with a likely debut in May, according to the report.
According to a repot in the Hollywood Reporter, Taye Diggs will star opposite Walsh in the spin-off.
Reportedly, the pilot episode will feature Dr. Addison-Shepherd on the verge of leaving Seattle Grace, a scenario that will be triggered if ABC decides to run with the spin-off next season.
No details on the character Diggs would play.
I believe in Miracles…
The ghosts showed up BECAUSE Meredith contemplated suicide after her mother dissed her during that lucid episode and Meredith was loosing her grip of reality and her zest and respect for the human existence she was loosing.
If you paid attention to past episodes her mother sent her to places she could not break out of. Her mother made her question her existence and if it was wirth living…
The reference to the “tub” was a shadow of her committing suicide in the tub, which is why Denny brought it up! They wanted to know if she gave up and sank to die or did she fight to get out of the water? Finally Meredith understood and conceded the point that she DID give up, hence she ended up there for a life review.
The girl was a patient that she worked on and lost, it was a moment of loss for Meredith. Meredith was always self conscious of her existence. With her mother dying and meeting up with her there, and she said that “Meredith was anything but ordinary” and she told her to run, and sent Meredith back to the living. The two were reconciled in the “In-Between.”
I think the meeting in the afterlife will come up later, we shall see. The fact that Denny was there – tells us that he was not ready to cross over, because he said that he and Izzy sometimes ended up in the same space at the same time, as the end montage showed us, finally, we think Denny crossed over, after helping Meredith understand the importance of Life and Living… The Nurse with Liver Cancer died on Meredith’s watch too. She knew Alice Grey all too well and she was a conscience reminder to Meredith. She called it as she saw it. To remind Meredith that she is not her mother…
Meredith had to learn the value of a human life, that’s why she met those four people on the other side… The bomb guy died saving Meredith’s life once, so he was trying to save her as well again – she wasn’t meant to die…
I’m addicted to Grey’s Anatomy and my life has become unmanageable…